Here I am
Semon preached at Enmore, Fourteenth Sunday after Pentecost, the 3rd of September 2023.
Readings: Exodus 3. 1–15. Romans 12. 9–21. Matthew 16. 21–28
The story of the call of Moses is one of the best-known passages in the Old Testament and much loved by Bible story artists. It is also an extended call narrative which begins in Chapter 3 verse one but continues to chapter 4 verse 17. To say that Moses was reluctant to obey God’s call is an understatement. Moses took a great deal of persuasion before he finally accepted the task God had for him.
The passage starts with Moses looking after the flock of his father-in-law, Jethro, the priest of Midian. He leads the flock away from the wilderness, to Horeb, which the narrator describes as being the mountain of God. He encounters a strange sight, a bush burning fiercely but not being consumed. He comes closer to examine this strange event and hears the voice of God calling his name, Moses, Moses. He responds, ‘Here I am’. We worship the God who knows our names, and Jesus declared that even the hairs on our head are numbered. God then calls Moses to come no closer and to remove his sandals, because the place where he stands is holy ground. The ground is holy because of God’s appearance, not because it was already holy. This is the first occurrence of the word ‘holy’ in the Bible and it significant that the concept is linked with God.
God then reveals himself to Moses as the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. In response Moses hides his face because he is afraid to look at God. God specifically acknowledges the faith of Moses’ own family. And the naming of the patriarchs demonstrates a continuity in God between Moses and his ancestors. The reference to the patriarchs also harks back to God’s promise to his people in chapter 2 of Exodus: “God heard their groaning and remembered his covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.”
The Lord then speaks to Moses and tells him his plans to rescue his people from their oppressors. Not only will he deliver them from the Egyptians, but he will bring them out of Egypt and into a land flowing with milk and honey. The Lord then reveals to Moses that he is to be the one to rescue the Israelites and bring them out of Pharaoh’s clutches!
Moses’ immediate response is to declare: “Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt?”
But God is ready with a reply: “I will be with you.” He then adds and ‘if you want a sign that you are the right man, when you have brought the people out of Egypt then you will worship God on this mountain.’ An odd statement from God until we remember that the mountain they are standing on is Mt. Sinai where Moses will later be given the ten commandments!
But Moses is still not convinced and has another response up his sleeve. He says to God “if the Israelites ask me who sent me and what is his name, what will I say?” God says to Moses: “I AM WHO I AM. This is the most common translation of the Hebrew but others are “I will be what I will be.” and “I will be who I am / I am who I will be”. Anticipating confusion from this cryptic word God tells Moses to say to the Israelites: “I AM sent me to you.” The divine name is built on the Hebrew verb ‘to be’ and is related to the divine name used frequently throughout the Old Testament, Yahweh, or YHWH. This special name of God is considered so holy that it is not to be pronounced in prayer or worship. The NRSV uses ‘the Lord’ in preference to using Yahweh.
God knows that behind Moses’s question “What is his name” is a plea for assurance and possibly an expression of Moses’s fear at the task being asked of him. The conversation between Moses and God begun in chapter 3 verse 4 continues through to chapter 4.17. Moses tries to find ways to get out of the task God is wanting to give him. His struggle is real, he has no personal ambition, and he has no confidence in his abilities but God has an answer for every excuse. What is clear is that God promises to be with Moses in all that he undertakes, he will not be left alone. The history of the church reveals many apparently ordinary people who did great things for God. One thinks of Gladys Aylward the young English woman who believed that God was calling her to go as a missionary to China. She was turned down by missionary societies but decided to go anyway using all her savings. After travelling alone into China in the early 1920’s she spent the rest of her life there, improving the lives of women and having her work recognized by the Chinese authorities. In the !950’s a film was made of her life. When God calls us for a task, he always promises to go with us.
We move from Exodus to some thoughts about the Gospel reading from Matthew 16. In the reading last Sunday, Jesus asked his disciples the question, ‘Who do you say that I am’ and Peter made the famous statement: “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” It was a momentous moment and there may have been a gasp from some of the disciples. They had probably all been thinking this was true but up till now no one had been game to actually declare it. Jesus praises Peter for making this statement and says that his Father in heaven was the one who had given Peter this insight. The affirmation that Jesus is the Messiah is the turning point of this Gospel.
In the passage read this morning Jesus reveals to his disciples what is going to happen in the coming days. He tells them that he will undergo great suffering at the hands of the religious leaders and that he will be killed and on the third day be raised. Peter is having none of that and takes Jesus aside telling him that none of these things should happen. Jesus’ response to Peter is harsh: “Get behind me Satan, you are a stumbling block to me”. We have quickly moved from Jesus praising Peter and telling him that he is the rock on which Jesus will build his church, to Peter setting his mind on human things, not divine things. Peter may understand that Jesus is the Messiah, but he does not yet understand what it means to be the Messiah.
Jesus then explains that following him will involve taking up the cross and denying themselves. Peter is not the only one who has trouble with this message. Theologian and martyr Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who wrote about the cost of discipleship, saw in Peter’s reaction evidence that “from its very beginning. the Church has taken offence at the suffering Christ.” Jesus did not go seeking suffering for himself or his disciples and in his ministry, he often spent time alleviating suffering. None the less suffering often tends to accompany those who follow his path.
Jesus reminds his followers that those who save their life lose it. A life controlled by fear of suffering and death is a life already lost. But to lose one’s life in following Jesus in the subversive way of the cross is ironically to find life. (Anna Case-Winters)
Fr Philip Bradford